Putting a price on CO₂ emissions and thus making emissions more expensive can make a significant contribution to reducing them. In a study published in The Economic Journal, Prof. Dr. Fabian Herweg, University of Bayreuth, and Prof. Dr. Klaus M. Schmidt, LMU Munich, compare two governmental instruments of carbon pricing with regard to their effectiveness: A carbon tax strengthens the willingness of households to voluntarily reduce CO₂ emissions. In contrast, a market for trading emission allowances that is based on a pre-determined emissions cap has a discouraging effect. It leads to higher emissions and shifts the burden of climate protection onto consumers with lower incomes.
Carbon taxation is ecologically more effective and socially equitable than trading of emission allowances
Reader’s Picks
-
Days after two California massacres involving the Asian American community, many are seeking to understand what drove two men to [...]
-
Even if you think you are good at analyzing faces, research shows many people cannot reliably distinguish between photos of [...]
-
You’ve made plans to meet up with a good friend in a few hours, but now all you want to [...]