Discussion of “alternative facts” has gained sad notoriety in US politics. Yet the question has been around much longer: How do people conduct political debates—is the focus more on facts or personal opinions? In the journal Nature Human Behaviour, a team of international researchers led by the Cluster of Excellence “The Politics of Inequality” looked into the matter.
US political rhetoric: Analysis of 8 million speeches shows increased reliance on personal beliefs over facts
Reader’s Picks
-
Men experiencing intimate partner violence turn to harmful coping strategies due to limited services and persistent social stigma, according to [...]
-
Imagine being a therapist and sitting across from a client who casually admits to kicking their dog. They kick until [...]
-
Tightly connected communities tend to be more resilient when facing extreme events such as earthquakes, hurricanes, floods or wildfires, says [...]