Discussion of “alternative facts” has gained sad notoriety in US politics. Yet the question has been around much longer: How do people conduct political debates—is the focus more on facts or personal opinions? In the journal Nature Human Behaviour, a team of international researchers led by the Cluster of Excellence “The Politics of Inequality” looked into the matter.
US political rhetoric: Analysis of 8 million speeches shows increased reliance on personal beliefs over facts
Reader’s Picks
-
When Grandma and Grandpa are in charge, the children are likely staring at a screen—a long-standing parental complaint now supported [...]
-
Researchers at the University of Tsukuba have demonstrated that intensified environmental variability (EV) can promote the evolution of cooperation through [...]
-
Using Major League Baseball as a case study, Cornell research highlights potential shortcomings in diversity metrics that could obscure inequities [...]