AI-generated impersonations of political figures are judged by members of the public to be more authentic, relevant and coherent than the speakers’ actual debate responses, according to a study appearing in PLOS One, written by Steffen Herbold of the University of Passau in Germany, and colleagues.
AI-generated debate replies outscore real politicians on authenticity and coherence
Reader’s Picks
-
South Africa is pioneering new ways to embed ethical benefit sharing in genomics research through community-led decision-making. Speaking at the [...]
-
Mass shooting incidents and car crashes may seem like two unrelated incidents, but a recent study has uncovered that there [...]
-
Framing environmental risks in terms of how much time is left, rather than a future date, makes them feel more [...]