Does keeping authors’ identities secret during peer review make the process more fair? A new large-scale field study, led by Indiana University College of Arts and Sciences Professor Tim Pleskac in collaboration with Ellie Kyung (Babson College), Gretchen Chapman (Carnegie Mellon University), and Oleg Urminsky (University of Chicago), finds that the answer is more complicated than many expect.
Team evaluates reliability of author identity concealment for peer-review process
Reader’s Picks
-
Big tech company hype sells generative artificial intelligence (AI) as intelligent, creative, desirable, inevitable, and about to radically reshape the [...]
-
Much previous work in the social sciences has involved researchers—often but not always from the Global North—collecting data from rural [...]
-
Research by Royal Holloway has found people with a varied social life mentally put their daily experiences into small “events,” [...]