Science journalists aren’t particularly concerned about so-called “predatory journals,” confident that they have the skills and intuition needed to avoid reporting on problematic research. For many, a journal’s reputation and name-recognition are decisive factors in assessing the quality of scientific research—but this could be exacerbating existing imbalances in science and journalism.
The hidden cost of reputation-driven science reporting
Reader’s Picks
-
This back-to-school season, students across Quebec are adjusting to a significant policy change: cellphones are now fully banned in elementary [...]
-
Adolescence is a period when some teenagers begin experimenting with risky or rule-breaking behaviors such as skipping school, drinking, lying, [...]
-
Researchers from the University of Adelaide have explored how cultural norms and beliefs have shaped the intimate relationships and attitudes [...]