A new study from Virginia Tech found that scientists’ credibility often hinges on their perceived motivations. “Our study finds that perceptions of scientists’ motivation to serve the public good are the strongest predictor of whether Americans trust them, accept their information as credible, and support science-based policies,” said Dara Wald, associate professor in environmental policy and planning.
Scientists’ credibility depends on audience and perceived motives
Reader’s Picks
-
South Africa is pioneering new ways to embed ethical benefit sharing in genomics research through community-led decision-making. Speaking at the [...]
-
Mass shooting incidents and car crashes may seem like two unrelated incidents, but a recent study has uncovered that there [...]
-
Framing environmental risks in terms of how much time is left, rather than a future date, makes them feel more [...]